"Learning the law is not really about learning legal rules and standards. It is primarily about learning to make connections - distinctions, analogies, comparisons, and contrasts - between and among cases and doctrines. The biggest thrill I get as a teacher is seeing that light bulb go on in a student's head when he or she makes one of these connections. And sometimes, it is something that even I did not see before."
Mike Mannheimer received his J.D. in 1994 from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar all three years and served as Writing & Research Editor of the Columbia Law Review. After a brief stint as a staff attorney with the Criminal Appeals Bureau of the Legal Aid Society in New York City, he clerked for the Hon. Sidney H. Stein of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and then for the Hon. Robert E. Cowen of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
From 1997 to 1999, he worked as a litigation associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison in New York City, where he practiced general commercial litigation and arbitration encompassing such diverse areas as antitrust, breach of contract, business torts, employment discrimination, ERISA, false advertising, product liability, and civil RICO.
For five years before joining the Chase faculty in 2004, Professor Mannheimer served as Appellate Counsel and then Senior Appellate Counsel at the Center for Appellate Litigation in New York City, where he represented indigent criminal defendants on appeal from their convictions and in related collateral proceedings. He has briefed and/or argued over forty appeals in the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He has represented clients at every level of the state and federal judiciaries, from handling sentencing proceedings, motions, and hearings in the New York trial courts to filing cert. petitions in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Professor Mannheimer's scholarship has appeared or is forthcoming in such journals as the Columbia Law Review, Texas Law Review, Notre Dame Law Review, Emory Law Journal, Indiana Law Journal, and Iowa Law Review. His work has been cited by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits, federal district courts in Massachusetts, Vermont, and West Virginia, and the high courts of Montana and Vermont. His work on the use of the premeditation-deliberation formula to distinguish first- and second-degree murder was the winner of the 2010 AALS Criminal Justice Section Junior Scholar Paper Award. His current research focuses on the under-appreciated federalism component of the Bill of Rights.
Fraudulently Induced Confessions, 96 Notre Dame L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming 2021) SSRN
“Eighth Amendment Federalism,” in The Eighth Amendment and Its Future in a New Age of Punishment (William Berry & Meghan Ryan, eds) (forthcoming Cambridge U. Press 2020)
Vagueness as Impossibility, 98 Tex. L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming 2020) SSRN
Three-Dimensional Dual Sovereignty: Observations on the Shortcomings of Gamble v. United States, 52 Tex. Tech. L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming 2020) (invited symposium submission)
The Unusual Case of Anthony Chebatoris: The “New Deal for Crime” and the Federal Death Penalty, 70 Syracuse L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming 2020) SSRN
Decentralizing Fourth Amendment Search Doctrine, 107 Ky. L.J. 169 (2019)
The Local-Control Model of the Fourth Amendment, 108 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 253 (2018)
The Coming Federalism Battle in the War Over the Death Penalty, 70 Ark. L. Rev. 309 (2017) (invited symposium submission)
The Two Mirandas, 43 N. KY. L. REV. 317 (2016) SSRN (invited symposium submission)
Gideon, Miranda, and the Downside of Incorporation, 12 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 401 (2015) (invited symposium submission) SSRN
The Contingent Fourth Amendment, 64 Emory L.J. 1229 (2015) SSRN
Harmelin’s Faulty Originalism, 14 Nev. L.J. 522 (2014) SSRN
Proportionality and Federalism: A Response to Professor Stinneford, 97 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 51 (2011) pdf
Not the Crime But the Cover-up: A Deterrence Based Rationale for the Premeditation-Deliberation Formula, 86 Ind. L.J. 879 (2011) (winner of the 2010 AALS Criminal Justice Section Junior Scholar Paper Award) pdf SSRN
The Impact of Information Overload on the Capital Jury's Ability to Assess Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, 17 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1089 (2009) (co-authored with Katie Morgan) Hein Online